Trailers

Saturday, January 31, 2009

It's Lycan Action-Horror Movie

Called 'horror' mostly for its Gothic style and for being about vampires and werewolves, it's not at all scary. But, it is full of action and an epic-style story. Plus some romance if you want that. :)

Personally I'd just call Underworld: Rise of the Lycans an action movie, but since it's placed in the horror genre (and there wasn't any other horror flick on that week o_o) I'll include it here.

But let's not let that bring us down! Yay! Action movie!

Right, so, it was pretty good. The effects were nice with some cool looking werewolves going around. Though there could have been more action sequences, what they had was intense. Everything from close combat to huge ballistae. I especially liked that they briefly had a human that could kick some butt too. Still, it delivered part of what we all went to see: more Werewolf vs Vampire craziness!
(FINISH HIM!)

Yet, it didn't so much fill the other part: Underworld. The first movie (and even the second one) had more of a horror feel than this one. Creepy scenes, Gothic but also unknown, and even the style of a gritty underworld were lacking in this third installment. To me, it felt like a separate story, even though many parts were related to the other two films. Really, when you get right down to it, it might as well have been. As things stand though, it is Underworld, and I enjoyed watching it just fine. And to be fair, I guess the werewolves were at times a little intimidating. ;)
("Wanna be friends?! :D")

The cast was great. Solid acting all around. Michael Sheen returned to play Lucian and did his job in the rebel-slave-leader-who-is-also-a-werewolf role. Like everyone else, I was sad that we wouldn't be seeing Kate Beckinsale, but they brought in Rhona Mitra (woo!), which was nice. :) And then we have Bill Nighy returning as well as the tyrannous lead vampire Viktor. I once again loved how he played the cold, self-centered, powerhungry, merciless Viktor, unblinking and for some reason always seeming like he is trembling with wrath. That's him on the right. Creepy.

The romance was your typical star-crossed lovers thing... with wolf-mans and vamps, but yeah, same old. That was one of the big things that separated this movie from the others: deep down it was a love story. Sure the other ones had some romance, but this was Romeo and Juliet... if Juliet could kill a man with the flick of her wrist. Like I said, good for some movies, but is it "Underworld"?
(D'awww...)

Now for them critic people. They tossed this movie to the wolves (pardon the intended pun). Seriously, they tore it apart. Many were put off by how different it was than the others. One guy, Jeffrey M. Anderson, at Rotten Tomatoes had this to say on that note:

...it quickly turns into a pretty standard-issue "revolt of the slaves" action picture...

I disagreed with some other things he said, but he's right there. However, some of the critics just plain sounded ignorant in their bashing of Rise of the Lycans. Some said Sheen's movement from roles in dramas (like Frost/Nixon or The Queen) made his place in an action movie awkward and laughable. Uh, sorry to disappoint those poor fools but he's been in action movies before either of those said roles (like Underworld and Timeline). Did I mention he did a good job in those action movies too? Oh, how silly of me, because he did. So, that was "dumb criticism #1" from them. Number two would probably just be the way they boohoo'd about how they didn't enjoy action and the story. The problem with many critics is that they get too involved in their own opinions and don't look at the movie objectively. Take a look at the review done at The Movie Blog by John Campea. He had some interesting things to say, but most of all he looked at the good and the bad and rated it fairly. Unlike the rot some critics spout out, senselessly declaring that they were bored or that it was stupid, or such things.

Overall: Definately worth the watch, especially if you're a fan of the series. It's different, yes, but a good different. And yes, for those of you who were disappointed in Underworld 2, this one makes up for it. I'd make some joke about how you could sink your teeth into it, but I wouldn't want to sound cliché would I? Oh.

4 comments:

  1. I was really happy when I saw that you wrote about Underworld because, although I have not seen it myself, I have heard that there is an amazing love story in it. So if there are any women out there not interested in the action packed vampires vs. Lycans they could enjoy the romance. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was wondering why Kate Beckinsale wasn't in this one. Even though Rhona Mitra looks just like her.. do they play the same character?

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Lacey
    Yeah, it had its share of romance. Other than the violence, it was pretty much a movie for everyone!

    @Courtney
    No, this one takes place hundreds of years before. Viktor was still around back then (he's old :P ). Rhona plays Viktor's biological daughter. Kate played a somewhat newly turned vampire (in the present day), who Viktor sortof adopted. Probably because, like you said, they look alike. :D

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am an Underworld fan and was WAY excited to see a prequel coming out about one of my faves of the series, Lucian. I freaking love him!! I saw this and it was pretty good, not bad...okay. I really wanted more to the story that what we already know from Lucian's memory in Underworld 1, but it didn't give any before and only a little after of what we already knew. I wanted more love story of course because it wasn't very developed but I am letting it go because I know it's an action movie. But the acting was really good for JUST an action flick. Vampire and Lycan(especially Michael Sheen) chaos rocks my world!

    *Note: Kate Beckinsale turned down the opportunity to do an extension of her story in a third movie, so they decided to make a prequel.

    ReplyDelete